<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micropresentations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html</link>
	<description>Disrupting Innovation since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 12:57:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html/comment-page-1#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I actually used one of Tufte&#039;s examples in that presentation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually used one of Tufte&#8217;s examples in that presentation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html/comment-page-1#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html#comment-246</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve almost certainly seen it before, but in case you haven&#039;t, Edwarde Tufte (www.edwardtufte.com) has long spoken about the plague of PowerPoint and how it reduces the impact and data density of presentations.  He has a famous booklet about it:  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve almost certainly seen it before, but in case you haven&#8217;t, Edwarde Tufte (www.edwardtufte.com) has long spoken about the plague of PowerPoint and how it reduces the impact and data density of presentations.  He has a famous booklet about it:<br />
<a href="http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint" rel="nofollow">http://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/powerpoint</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Crawford</title>
		<link>http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html/comment-page-1#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Actually, not quite. In this case, they base their assessments on what they expect other people will absorb. Structure is very important if you&#039;re trying to communicate with audiences that don&#039;t have the background to absorb complex concepts on the fly. Classic PowerPoint does have its time and place--as does a speech before questions. What I&#039;m not buying is broad applicability of this particular way out.
&lt;br /&gt;
The funny thing here was that my the topic of the presentation was about why PowerPoint drives an artificially linear approach to presenting. Hence, irony.
&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s also funny because I do this all the time - in my career I&#039;ve probably given hundreds of talks with nary a slide behind them, often in front of audiences of several hundred people (the record is probably a thousand or so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, not quite. In this case, they base their assessments on what they expect other people will absorb. Structure is very important if you&#8217;re trying to communicate with audiences that don&#8217;t have the background to absorb complex concepts on the fly. Classic PowerPoint does have its time and place&#8211;as does a speech before questions. What I&#8217;m not buying is broad applicability of this particular way out.<br />
<br />
The funny thing here was that my the topic of the presentation was about why PowerPoint drives an artificially linear approach to presenting. Hence, irony.<br />
<br />
It&#8217;s also funny because I do this all the time &#8211; in my career I&#8217;ve probably given hundreds of talks with nary a slide behind them, often in front of audiences of several hundred people (the record is probably a thousand or so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html/comment-page-1#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.integrativestream.com/2006/03/11/micropresentations.html#comment-214</guid>
		<description>&quot;although Iâ€™m not sure that I buy it.&quot;

Wasn&#039;t your experience a question of you teacher not buying it? Most people who are in a position to grade or rate stuff usually stick to what they know and (think they) like. A &quot;real&quot; audience is something else entirely.

Don&#039;t base your opinion on a sigle experience in an artificial environment, but then again - there&#039;s a time and place for everything... corny but true. Let what you are presenting, and to whom, be your guide. On a final note - it&#039;s also about who YOU are - some people just don&#039;t work well with various types of presentations. See http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/11/the_zen_estheti.html as a clear example. I would *love* to be able to do what Jobs does, but without a lot of practice I know I&#039;d fall so far short of the mark that it would just confuse the audience, so I stick to my middle ground between the two for now, but I&#039;m getting better at the Jobs&#039; style, because *I* like it and I find the times I pull it off, so does the audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;although Iâ€™m not sure that I buy it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t your experience a question of you teacher not buying it? Most people who are in a position to grade or rate stuff usually stick to what they know and (think they) like. A &#8220;real&#8221; audience is something else entirely.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t base your opinion on a sigle experience in an artificial environment, but then again &#8211; there&#8217;s a time and place for everything&#8230; corny but true. Let what you are presenting, and to whom, be your guide. On a final note &#8211; it&#8217;s also about who YOU are &#8211; some people just don&#8217;t work well with various types of presentations. See <a href="http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/11/the_zen_estheti.html" rel="nofollow">http://presentationzen.blogs.com/presentationzen/2005/11/the_zen_estheti.html</a> as a clear example. I would *love* to be able to do what Jobs does, but without a lot of practice I know I&#8217;d fall so far short of the mark that it would just confuse the audience, so I stick to my middle ground between the two for now, but I&#8217;m getting better at the Jobs&#8217; style, because *I* like it and I find the times I pull it off, so does the audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
